Will You Press The Button?

IchibanKasugalast month

Bryce I will defeat you!

Vert9998 years ago

The upside is a downside and the downside is an upside

Loophole man8 years ago

You are correct. Sometimes, nuclear weapons are necessary, and nuclear power will put a stop to the world ending from pollution

ScalyWeasel7 years ago

49% don't know how safe and reliable nuclear power actually is.

urimegaconnor7 years ago

no downside.

coolbat9047 years ago

This actually creates more danger, because anyone could drop a regular bomb on the nuclear power plant and createn a nuclear explosion

Bgoerz055 years ago

Actually, nuclear plants are built so that doesn't happen.

bezvous8 years ago

Only thing that can go wrong in nuclear power plants is human factor. Like in Chernobil and if that happens it will start chain reaction and whole world will blow.

P77 years ago

Y U NO GIBE A DAM DOWNSIDE. Yea "dam", like percy jackson dam

Jay-the-Argonian8 years ago

Basically the world of fallout without bombs?

DragonEXE6 years ago

WE’RE FUCKED

RowanDavis6 years ago

I already live near one.

TheMultimention7 years ago

No! I want my explosions!!!! 😭

Alex Merezas11 years ago

how is there even a downside to this, nuclear power plants are much safer than coal-powered ones.

Hyltran3 years ago

To say that it could “blow up” is like saying we should not have airplanes ✈️ because of the Hindenburg disaster.

Load more replies

BobbyMcslobby7 years ago

My dog fartes

IsHARI8 years ago

no downside

That_One_Weird_Wolf3 years ago

anybody hear about the "walking ghost phase"? its where all the chromosomes in your body die, and you cant make any more. so your body slowly becomes a corpse. if a nuclear power plant were to blow up, this could happen. so, my conclusion is, HELL NO.

Acespeed8 years ago

there is other ways to make power

Malcolmxt6 years ago

Insta yes nuclear reactors evidence wise is the least dangourus of the coal and other types of reactors. Also nuclear reactors dont explode so they wont set each other off. Also canada would be rich after this since we have the largest uranium mine in the ...[Show full comment]

Natanm17 years ago

World peace a good power source why the fucking hell nit

Hamistagan7 years ago

just hope to god terrorist dont target the small town i live in

Hyltran3 years ago

If we want to stop 🛑 global warning we haw no other reasonable option then to haw a small nuclear ☢️ power plant close to every significant city.

SemiIsback6 years ago

Yesss no NK then,.....

9u4ck3rs3 years ago

The only reason that no country has fired it"s nuclear weapons is because everyone else would fire their weapons and basically end/ destroy the world

ssuper slade8 years ago

if you pushed the button gg world

Benjamin Istaqa11 years ago

I PRESS ALL THE RED BUTTONS!!!

push?8 years ago

WHY!!! put in your ipinion

C7_Aerospace6 years ago

fission or fusion?

OscarZhang6 years ago

Hope it is fusion, much safer. Although over all nuclear power plants are still one of the safest forms of power in the world

Load more replies

lewis04282 years ago

Simply use higher technology to stop meltdowns. No more air pollution. WIN-WIN.

Migdin17 years ago

If a nuclear power plant explodes, it would make an Nuculear explision, and that is in a way a Nuculear weapon, so they cant harm you

Lzke6 years ago

Only that a nuclear bomb ironically doesn't have as much harmful radiation and fallout as a nuclear reactor exploding. So yea...

Transgender8 years ago

That would kill every city on earth. Just imagine terrorist blowing them up or creating NEW nuclear weapons

Lzke6 years ago

How exaclty do you disarm weapons? I mean it"s not like a nuke is carryong a fucking shotgun on its back (whereever that may be)

Lioth3 months ago

So long as a third party runs each of the plants, this is fine.

MaikHD20043 years ago

Nuclear power in what form? Fusion or split?

Flab bag morris8 years ago

Freaky208 years ago

So... Fallout?

#Rekt8 years ago

FALLOUT YES >:D GET YOUR STIMPAKS AT THE READY

Load more replies

KoseiPL2 years ago

Mfs not clicking: i dOnt WaNT SEcOnd cHErNoBYL

BristolBrick8 years ago

That would make the fucking sun disappear.

Lzke6 years ago

How on earth did you reach that conclusion?

Load more replies

UnitZulu-5 years ago

I feel at that point trying to upkeep the plants to not leak radiation would start being very expsensive and dangerous

Umbrella3 years ago

most nuclear power plants now use thorium a much safer element and it even works better than uranium there are lots of videos on the internet about this topic and I ain't no expert but I know that nuclear power is much safer than driving a car.

ofpgrimm1028 years ago

this is the world all ready so yeah

Lzke6 years ago

Austria is a lot bigger than 5 miles yet we only have one nuclear reactor that never started operating. What"s your point exactly?

BebeRocks6 years ago

I"ve seen how this one went in fallout

Steeler247 years ago

We need nuclear weapons

Lzke6 years ago

For what? To blast ourselves into oblivion?

T._Lost_is_a_good_boi7 months ago

Let’s ignore all laws of nuclear physics for a moment and assume that bombing a reactor is equivalent to said reactor going into a Chernobyl-esque meltdown. Bombing any city’s power plant(s) makes that (section of said) city practically unlivable for decad...[Show full comment]

SceptileandMew4 years ago

@theaceace you might not have read it but all nuclear disasters are caused but nuclear weapons F A C T S

imavirginnn3 years ago

nuke

BugTypeEevee6 years ago

It said nuclear weapons were disarmed not nuclear power.

midnightiscool958 years ago

Downside?

adihan5 months ago

I laughed at him for two and a half years! If you want to participate in nuclear war, press it as much as you like!!

EVILDE5TROYER7 years ago

But wind and solar power are much better for the atmosphere and are less likely to explode

OscarZhang6 years ago

They are unpredictable and nobody can control the weather so nuclear is better for the power grid

BoCo3657 years ago

I"d rather not have another Chernobyl

ChristianSmith7 years ago

To Alex Merezas, search up Chernobyl

SexyPandaSoldier7 years ago

Terrible. Everyone would suffer radiation damage and a chernobyl would be a weekly thing with that number of reactors besides we"d run out of nuclear fuel really really quickly and no nuclear deterrent to stop wars... Stupid

Lzke6 years ago

To be fair. Chernobyl was a fault on the Government, not the technology. But still if a nuclear reactor explodes. Well you"re fucked

Notifications

84 Comments

Login or register to comment